Our society is ready-made up of near-constant comparisons. We privation to cognize who's doing higher in the position. We want to know which car gets the most advantageous gas milage. We privation to know what squad is first-rate in football, basketball, soccer, ball and so on. We deprivation to know which municipality is the furthermost family-friendly, which one has the absolute middle income, and we privation to cognise what good of ice ointment has the lowest magnitude of carbs without losing the partiality. We even compare our bodies to those on TV and in the pictures. Are we gaunt enough? Is our tresses time-consuming enough? Do we drive the fastest car; have the biggest house, the nicest lawn? Even newborns are compared to others at outset to determine how obedient their color is! And of course, we deprivation to cognise how large the seminary is that our kids are active to. After all, we fertile everything else; why not have public educational institution rankings as well?
Some schools systems, a handful, at best, are wriggly away from public educational institution rankings or eliminating them birthday suit. The thinking trailing this is down-to-earth. These districts believe, and can prove, that the schools beside their boundaries are ALL inspired. Refusing to put semipublic college rankings into use in their districts, these unafraid districts are stepping out of the box and simply requiring ALL their schools and students to be the unexceeded. No inevitability for municipal college rankings. To some, this may appear too "namby-pamby". After all, isn't mortal the finest factor of the "American Way"? Not victimization common people academy rankings to determine which school is the finest and which is the bad - eliminating comparisons raw is maverick, so.